EDRG 4020 Reading Comprehension
Course Description: Teacher candidates learn how to assist readers to construct meaning as they read both narrative and expository text. Comprehension theories are taught in relation to best practices for enhancing reading and writing. Prerequisites: EDRG 3520, EDRG 4010, EDRG 4040.
Comments: Because the popular media and educational policy makers often seem preoccupied with issues related to word identification, the importance of comprehension can be easily overlooked. A growing body of research suggests how teachers can effectively teach students to combine their personal knowledge and experience with print information to construct meaning as they read. Instructional strategies such as activating students' background knowledge, connecting vocabulary, teaching students to recognize text structures along with the common strategies of summarizing, clarifying, questioning, predicting, and evaluating can help students become independent navigators of text. These strategies also help build engagement and motivation for reading.
Basic Goals:
Required Texts:
Keene, E. O.& Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: The power of comprehension strategy instruction (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0-325-01035-9
Reference Texts:
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension. York, ME: Stenhouse.
Tentative Schedule:
Assignments/Accountability/Artifacts
1. Participation & Attendance: 150 points. Actively participate in class discussions, and/or field experiences as assigned, demonstrating knowledge and teaching effectiveness for comperehension. (Online/Independent Study students will write and email the instructor a 1.5-2 page summary of each Chapter and the epilogue in the Keene & Zimmerman text [10 summaries] and write a 2-3 page paper explaining the difference between the movie and the book - Holes or I am David, whichever one was chosen for assignment 7)
2. One Article Response: 30 points. Your response should include the following: Full bibliographical citation-5 pts., a brief summary of the article-5 pts., a brief discussion of the validity of the article (Did the author/s support his/her/their points with research and/or examples from classrooms?)-5 pts., Do you agree with the author/s? & Why or why not?-5 pts., and How will the information from the article affect your future teaching?-5 pts. **This article review might be placed in your e-portfolio under INTASC Standard 1: Content Knowledge 3. Strategy Presentation: 20 points. Apply, demonstrate, and present a comprehension strategy mini-lesson that was or can be utilized in a classroom. Tie it to a specific text and teach your peers or a group of students how to use the strategy with the chosen text. 4. Inquiry Unit: 50 points. Create an Inquiry-Based Unit (could be a WebQuest) of Instruction for integrated literacy instruction, including basics from at least one of the content areas--math, social studies, science, language arts, or the arts to be infused into the instructional unit. Also include a description of how the environmental setting is created or imitated, and describe the stimulus for inquiry and why you chose that particular one.
5. Chart/Poster: 20 points. Create, at least, one comprehension chart or poster that can be used in the classroom. This chart can complement your strategy presentation or support your Inquiry Unit. It may be created using PowerPoint or Inspiration software and turned in on disc or via email.
6. Participate in a literature circle/book club experience with the Keene & Zimmerman Text: 150 points. After being assigned literature circle roles for each chapter of the Keene & Zimmerman text, participate in the large group literature circle for that chapter. At the end of the session, open the discussion up to the class to add their impressions of the chapter.
8. Final Examination: 150 pts. Each individual must take the final examination. It will be online and accessible via eLearning during the Final Examination scheduled time for the class only! It is open book!
700 points total
Grading: Grades will be calculated as follows based on evidence of actively constructing meaning:
Grades will be assigned as follows: 95% & Up, A; 90-94.99%, A-; 87-89.99%, B+; 83-86.99%, B; 80-82.99%, B-; 77-79.99%, C+; 73-76.99%, C; 70%, C-; Below 70%, Try again.
Academic integrity policy: Scholastic dishonesty will not be tolerated and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent. You are expected to have read and understood the current issue of the student handbook (published by Student Services) regarding student responsibilities and rights, and the intellectual property policy, for information about procedures and about what constitutes acceptable on-campus behavior.
ADA Statement: Students with medical, psychological, learning or other disabilities desiring academic adjustments, accommodations, or auxiliary aids must contact the Office for Students with Disabilities. The Office for Students with Disabilities determines eligibility for and authorizes the provision of these services and aids.
Bibliography for Reading Instruction (K-12): Blachowicz, C., & Fisher, P. (1996). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. Cooper, J. D. (2000). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (4th ed.). New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin. Flynt, E. S., & Cooter, R. B. Jr. (2001). Flynt-Cooter Reading Inventory for the Classroom (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Fox, B. J. (1996). Strategies for word identification: Phonics from a new perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. Gipe, J. P. (1995). Corrective reading techniques (3rd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick. Gunning, T. G. (2000). Creating reading instruction for all children (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. Holdaway, D. (1979). Foundations of literacy. Sydney, Australia: Ashton Scholastic. Moore, D. W., Moore, S. A., Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (1998). Developing readers & writers in the content areas K-12 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman. Ruddell, R. B., Ruddell, M. R, & Singer, H. (Eds.), 1994. Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Salinger, T. S. (1996). Literacy for young children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill. Additional information can be found in the following major journals: The Reading Teacher, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy (formerly Journal of Reading), Modern Language Journal, English Journal, Reading Research Quarterly, Journal of Reading Behavior, Language Learning, English Language Teaching Journal, Journal of Verbal Learning/Behavior, System, and American Education Research Journal. (Other journals associated with reading are also useful.) |
|
Other information for this course (Use your browser's back button to return to this page except class notes) WebQuest Template, html version, MsWord doc version Presentation Notes
Information regarding the Praxis Content Test (including sample questions) On-line Journals, Articles, and Reports Reading Online Reading Resources for Teachers
|