Advanced Reading Comprehension

Purpose

Because the popular media and educational policy makers often seem preoccupied with issues related to word identification, the importance of comprehension can be easily overlooked. A growing body of research suggests to us how readers construct meaning and how teachers can effectively teach students to combine their personal knowledge and experience with print information to construct meaning as they read. Instructional strategies such as activating students' background knowledge, connecting vocabulary, teaching students to recognize text structures along with the common strategies of summarizing, clarifying, questioning, predicting, and evaluating can help students become independent navigators of text. These strategies also help build engagement and motivation for reading. This course is designed to have teachers examine existing research and its pedagogical implications related to teaching vocabulary, reading comprehension, metacognition, and motivation.

Course Objectives

After completing this course, you will be able to:

Course Topics

Assignments

Bibliography

Britton, B., & Graesser, A. (1996). Models of understanding text. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
Cooper, J.D. (2000). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
 
Dole, J., Duffy, G., Roehler, L., & Pearson, P. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
 
Dowhower, S. Supporting a strategic stance in the classroom: A comprehension framework for helping teachers help students to be strategic. The Reading Teacher, 52, 672-683.
 
Gambrell, L., Morrown, L., Neuman, S., & Pressley, M. (1999). Best practices in literacy instruction. New York: Guilford.
 
Graesser, A., Millis, K., Zwann, R. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
 
Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (1997).Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
 
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension. York, ME: Stenhouse.
 
Hynds, S. (1997). On the brink: Negotiating literature and life with adolescents. Newark, NJ International Reading Association.
 
Keene, E., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
 
Kintsch, W. (1989). Learning from text. In L. Resnick (Ed), Knowing, learning, and instruction. (pp 25-46).
 
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
Langer, J. (1995). Envisioning literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
Nagy, W.F. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
 
Palincsar, A., Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 117-175.
 
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. ((1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
 
Ruddell, R.B., Ruddell, M.R., Singer, H. (1994). Theoretical models and processes of reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
 
Taylor, B. Graves, M., & van den Broek, P., (2000). Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades. New York: Teachers College Press.
 
Weaver, C. (1998) Practicing what we know. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
 
Wood, E., Woloshyn, V., & Willoughby, T. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high schools. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
 
Zwann, R., Langston, M., & Graesser, A. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological science, 6, 292-297.