Utah State Office of Education
Reading specialist Endorsement
course Framework
READING SPECIALIST INTERNSHIP
Syllabus Framework
MEDUC_____ ,
Reading Specialist Internship (-- semester hours)
Instructor:
Catalog Description:
A field-based experience designed to give students an
opportunity to work with curriculum or school leaders for improving reading
instruction on a district or school level.
Course Description:
MEDUC_____ is
designed as the culminating experience for teachers who are completing the Utah
Advanced Reading Endorsement. This course fulfills the requirement for the
reading specialist internship. The purpose of this experience is to provide a
culminating, hands-on opportunity to be involved in literacy issues on a broader
school or district level in contrast with the student’s personal
experiences in his/her own classroom. It provides students with an opportunity
to work with curriculum leaders on school or district levels as they seek to
improve reading instruction and reading programs.
Course Outcomes:
Students in the internship experience will:
|
Course Outcomes: |
See Standards: |
|
1. Under
the supervison of district or school specialists, expand current theoretical
knowledge on practices and research findings to address and implement
applications for school or district improvement. |
1.6, 1.7,
11.5, and 16.1 |
|
2. Articulate
and demonstrate research-based literacy strategies for the improvement of
literacy learning for other school professionals. |
7.1, 11.4,
and 12.5 |
|
3. Work
with district or school specialists to explore a wide-variety of reading
programs and instructional and evaluation/assessment issues. |
10.0, 10.2, 12.1, and 12.3 |
|
4. Under
the supervision of district or school specialists develop and implement
professional development (learning) opportunities for teachers. |
11.2, 13.2, 13.3, and 13.4 |
|
Course Outcomes, Continued: |
See Standards: |
|
5. Work
with teachers to provide them with assistance and support to improve their
reading instruction. |
12.2, and 12.7 |
|
6. Work
with teachers to provide expert assessment and and intervention advice for
students with reading difficulties. |
4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4 |
|
7. Promote
self-monitoring of new learning as well as assess one’s previous
experiences with reading programs, instruction, assessment, and evaluation. |
13.5, 13.6, and 16.2 |
Suggested Course Requirements, Evaluation, and
Assignments:
The reading specialist internship is designed as a
culminating experience for the Utah Advanced Reading Endorsement. Congruent
with this philosophy, the student will submit a proposal for the internship to
be agreed to by a district coordinator and the university internship director.
The internship should allow for 60 to 90 hours of activity.
In
designing the internship, each student must assess her expertise using the
following list of competencies.
Competencies
for Level 2 Reading Specialists
1. Literacy textbook adoption
process
2. Struggling readers, assessment
and interventions
3. Inservice for literacy
4. Role of the staff developer on a
district and school level
5. Research knowledge
6. District budgeting process to
support literacy (What would your role be?)
7. Reading/writing instruction and
application across the curriculum
8. Integrating services/co-teaching:
Title I, spec. Ed., school media, etc.
9. Engagement of the community and
community partners
10. Model
literacy sites
11.
Technology in literacy instruction
12. Impact
of federal programs and initiatives
Write
briefly of your knowledge and experiences with each of the 12 competencies so
that your district supervisor and the university supervisor can assess your
level of knowledge and experience.
Pick your internship experiences to further build your knowledge and experience
in areas you are less acquainted with, and then gather information on the other
items.
Select one
activity from each of the three strands (curriculum, professional development, assessment and
evaluation) listed below to augment your knowledge and experience. on each of
the Should the student
desire an activity not listed below, advanced approval of the district
coordinator and the university internship director must be obtained.
Curriculum
Strand (examples):
1. Compare
and contrast at least 2 different reading programs under consideration by a
school or district. Prepare a written summary of each of the programs. Describe
the programs’ intended uses, their theoretical and/or research base,
costs of adoption, professional development issues and concerns, and how the
school or district would evaluate their effectiveness.
2. Investigate the processes of curriculum
integration. Develop a curriculum map for curriculum integration.
3. Research
an issue that poses a significant reading problem unique to the school or
district. Submit a written report that describes the nature of the problem, a
review of professional literature associate with the issue, and a recommended
course of action for the correction of that specific reading issue.
Professional
Development Strand (examples):
1. Plan, organize,
and implement a professional development offering that explores a specific
issue relating to literacy. This offering must include several sessions not a
one-shot in-service class.
2. Work
with the school or district to provide a struggling teacher with professional
support to improve reading instruction in that teacher’s classroom.
Summarize what assistance was provided and the effects of that assistance.
3. Design a
professional development plan for your personal knowledge and instruction base.
Follow your plan and submit a written report on what you did.
Assessment
and Evaluation Strand (examples):
1. Prepare
and present an evaluation of a current reading program already in use in your
school or district. Present your evaluation to the school’s principal or
district curriculum specialist. Describe a course of action that the school or
district may wish to follow based on your evaluation.
2. Work
with a district specialist who gathers numerical data for the district. Assist
that individual as he/she gathers, analyzes, interprets, and summarizes test
score data. Submit a written
report of what you did.
3. Work
with a classroom teacher to identify two or three students who need an
individual assessment and evaluation of their reading strengths and limitations.
Prepare a written summary of your assessment and evaluation.
Professional
Ethics:
Failure to
maintain academic ethics/academic honesty including the avoidance of cheating,
plagiarism, collusion, and falsification will result in an E in the course, and
may result in charges being issued, hearing being held and/or sanctions being
imposed.
Required
Text:
none
Evaluation
and Assessment:
This course
is offered on a credit/no credit basis. The school/district coordinator and the
university internship director will evaluate the student’s internship
experience and supporting artifacts. Credit or no credit will be based on the
quality of the experiences and artifacts.