|
What is MacroWeb? |
Four Billion Burning a Hole
in Saddam's Pocket?
As Operation Iraqi Freedom
comes to a close, Iraq's former regime's balance sheet is being pieced
together. A tentative accounting of the assets of Iraq's Baath
Party which were seized by Allied Forces is as follows:
Assets
$ 600 million in
already-frozen Iraqi assets
$1,740 million in Iraqi
government bank accounts that the U.S. confiscated March 2003
$1,200 million assets which
include currency, real estate and diamonds found April 2003
$ 756 million+ stashed away American dollars
$4,296 million
Many
questions come to mind after one sees the huge amount of Iraq's liquid
wealth, such as, "What was its intended use?" "Where did it come from?" and "Did
withholding all these assets from the Iraqi economy hurt it?" The first
question can only be answered by Saddam's regime. Many people believe that the
money was intended for illegal military spending and terrorist activity. Why
would a government hold such large amounts of depreciating cash unless it were
intended to be used for illegal activities? As far as where the money came
from, borrowing is a likely source. However, sources at the Wall Street
Journal state that most of Iraq's revenue came from oil exports. Due to the fact
that the Iraqis were not allowed to sell this oil, they chose instead to
smuggle it out of the country and sell it for cash, bypassing the oil-for-food
sanctions. This, in turn, helps answer the complicated third question.
At
first appearance, one would conclude that the withholding of such large amounts
of liquid assets would be detrimental to Iraq's economy. However, it is much more complex than it
appears. Iraq is a member of OPEC. OPEC restricts its members
petroleum output in an effort to keep prices high. Iraq was exporting
its fullest potential in oil under the "oil-for-food" sanction. In order to
obtain cash from oil revenues, Iraq would have to smuggle oil out under the noses of both
the UN and OPEC. The end result would be a decrease in the world's price of
oil, and a little cash in Iraq's pocket. The winners in this deal are the consumers
of oil and the Iraqi government. The losers in this deal are the oil exporters
and the additional deaths caused by Iraq's increased military capabilities. Are the Iraqi people
hurt by this? One can sometimes find an answer to a question by posing another
question, "Would the Iraqi government have illegally exported oil and then use
the money to improve the welfare of the Iraqi people?" Considering Iraq's track
record, it's not likely.
Works Cited:
Dow Jones Newswires. "5 US
Soldiers In IraqUnder Investigation For Theft." WallStreet
Journal. [New York] 23 Apr. 2003.
Schroeder, Michael. "U.S. and Its
Allies Have Found $1.2 Billion of Hussein's Assets"
Wall
Street Journal. [New York]10 Apr. 2003.
Dow Jones Newswires. "US
Soldiers Find An Estimated 656M US Dollars In ." Wall Street
Journal. [New York] 19 Apr. 2003.
|
Who is Dave Tufte? |
Copyright, Jake Miller, 2003. |