September 11
commemorative
edition

 


Back to current issue
January 30, 2003 edition

Red light

Blue-light specials next week
could signal Kmart’s goodbye

Kim Bond of Enoch works as a cashier at Kmart. Kmart plans to close by the end of March because of structural problems, despite a promise from the building’s landlord to pay for the repairs. Approximately 60 people could lose their jobs.
ANNE McCONNELL / UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

By TASHA WILLIAMS
UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

Despite commitment from the landlord to fix structural damage to the Cedar City Kmart, the store is still scheduled for closure by the end of March.
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Northern Illinois approved Kmart’s 316 closures Tuesday as a step to help Kmart emerge from bankruptcy.
The landlord offered to repair the cracked wall after the company chose to shut down “under-performing” locations Jan. 14. An out-of-state contractor estimated the wall would cost more than $1 million to fix, said Dick Flack, property management vice president for Barlow Nielsen Associates, the building’s owner.
Mayor Gerald R. Sherratt said he was assured by Kmart’s regional manger that the Cedar City store was profitable but was slated for closure because of significant structural damage to the store’s back wall.
The building’s landlord said the company is willing to take dramatic steps to keep the store open.
“We have told Kmart that we will completely repair the structural portion of the building at our expense,” Flack said.
Susan Dennis, Kmart spokeswoman, said she was unaware of the cracked wall. Nevertheless, as of Tuesday the store was still listed for closure, she said. The Cedar City store is not among the 10 stores whose status is being reconsidered, she added.
“If it wasn’t on our list of negotiations, then it’s probably not likely (that it will be saved),” Dennis said. “Obviously, I’m basing that on what information has been provided. I really couldn’t speak about what would happen after we emerge from Chapter 11.”
When an outside firm begins clearance sales as early as next week, it will be too late to stop the closure, Dennis said.
Barlow Nielsen’s repair proposal was sent to Kmart’s real estate office last week, but the office has yet to respond, Flack said.
“We have not had any response from them,” Flack said. “We have not heard an affirmative or a denial; we wish we would.”
Flack said it’s obvious there is a sense of urgency about the proposal.
“What makes the difference is that the agreement has to be done before they would start the going-out-of-business sales,” Flack said.
The only publicly known reason for closure is the wall, Flack said. He said it would be logical for Kmart to accept Barlow Nielsen’s offer if the wall is only reason for closure.
“We have been told and understood that the reason for the closure was not the fact that the store wasn’t profitable,” Flack said. “It was a profitable store. That’s why it makes no sense for them to close it. If that’s not the reason, then it could still close.
Until we hear from somebody we won’t know.”
Kmart declined a Journal request for financial data for the Cedar City store.
But beyond lack of profits, competitive market, distribution and lease were some of the things considered when closing stores, Dennis said.
“In terms of profitability, a store could have been considered marginally profitable and still be closed because of other factors,” she said.
Flack said Kmart knew about the wall more than a year ago and hired an out-of-state contractor who provided the $1 million repair estimate. The building’s back wall in the stock room is cracking, but Flack said he is unsure of the exact problem and hasn’t seen the repair plans.

Featured Articles:

Some problems require change

Stars tell more than good tales

SUU retains 10 players from 2002

Barlow Nielsen Associates is willing to pay for the structural repairs, even though building maintenance was originally Kmart’s responsibility.
“We don’t want the store to close,” Flack said. “We don’t want the vacancy of the shopping center. It’s not going to be an easy one to replace; there’s not a lot of people out there who are going to be willing to take an 83,000-square-foot building.
“We’d like them to stay open, and not just selfishly, but for the community,” he continued. “We think the competition is really healthy. But in your community when you’ve got limited retailers it doesn’t help to see that store close.”
Flack said once Kmart declared bankruptcy, its lease agreement changed.
When the court approved the closures Tuesday, the building’s maintenance responsibilities reverted to the landlord, Dennis said. Kmart is no longer bound by the lease.
The landlord is responsible for finding a new tenant, should the store close, Dennis said.
Sherratt said he will help entice another store to fill the vacancy if he can. Although Kmart’s closure is unfortunate, he said people will gravitate to other Cedar City stores.
“What I’ve learned is that if one goes down, another goes up,” he said.
Sherratt and members of the City Council contacted Kmart, asking the company to keep the Cedar City store open.
“We wrote a letter to Kmart and indicated that the Kmart store here was profitable, and it had a good fan base here in Cedar City, and that we’d be sorry to see it go,” Sherratt said. “We also pointed out that Cedar City is growing, and what is a good store now could even be a better store in the future.”
Clark Krause, Cedar City director of economic development, said the closure is unfortunate for the 60 people who lose their jobs. Kmart has been a good employer, and if it closes, it will affect Cedar City’s economy, particularly by putting a dent in the city’s sales taxes, Krause said.
“But the most important thing, though, is what it does to your local community and the jobs you’re losing firsthand,” Krause said. “That would be where your heart would go out first.”
Surrounding businesses in the Cedar South Plaza are likely to be affected, Krause said. Most stores are looking for a “big-box anchor” like Kmart to share business with, he said. While there are niche stores in the complex that will continue to prosper without Kmart, the store brought good energy to the complex, Krause said.
“If you lose somebody, you fill them with somebody better,” he said. “Not that there’s anybody better than Kmart. . . but as things happen, they happen on a national economy level, they’re going to happen on a local level. Things change. With that, you’re still affecting those estimated 57 people. You never want to put your people through that.”
Keeping in mind the tragedy of Kmart’s possible closure, Krause said it is important to remember that retail is only one part of the economy.
Other general merchandise stores featuring groceries, hardware, lumber and other merchandise have been doing well in Cedar City. In the last quarter, general merchandise sales were up 6 percent, he said.
Despite general merchandise’s success, Krause said he still thinks it’s unfortunate for Kmart to leave.
“You don’t want to lose anybody,” he said. “You don’t want to lose jobs. You don’t want to see your neighbor affected. But in a city this small you will personally know people affected by any closure.”
But Krause said many other economic sectors that have prospered. Manufacturing has had success, and now comprises 25 percent of the jobs in Cedar City, he said. People generally only pay attention to retail, since that is what affects them most directly.
The economy works in a complicated cycle, Krause said.The city recruits jobs that will pay higher wages. When people begin to make more money, they will have more to spend in retail. When demand is strong enough, retail will grow.
SUU students and Cedar City residents shopping Tuesday night at the stores said they shopped at Kmart infrequently.
Jason Monroe, a sophomore political science major from Richfield, and Ashley Washburn, a sophomore elementary education major from Monroe, shopped at Wal-Mart Tuesday night. They said when they’re at home they shop at Kmart because there isn’t any other store, but when they’re in Cedar City, they do the majority of their shopping at Wal-Mart.
“I don’t know if it (the closure) affects me directly because I go to Wal-Mart, but it’s still a loss of a job,” Washburn said.
Monroe said the first time he went to Kmart this year was about two weeks ago to buy the jacket he was wearing Tuesday.
Steve Smith, a sophomore biology major from Salt Lake City who also shopped at Wal-Mart Tuesday night, said he never shops at Kmart.
“My very first year, I think I went there once,” Smith said.
Kerrie Jones, a Cedar City resident and one of only two shoppers at Kmart Tuesday night at about 9 p.m., said overall Kmart is a “good place” but she doesn’t shop there frequently.
“In all honesty, I don’t shop here that often,” Jones said, “but I do feel bad for the employees.”

South Hall
demolished
by summer

By ELIZABETH MILLER
UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

The state will fund a capital improvement project to create a new facility at SUU in place of the South Hall, which is scheduled to be demolished as soon as Spring semester is over.
“We requested to upgrade the building,” said Greg Stauffer, vice president of Administrative & Financial Services. “The state said because of age and condition, let’s spend a little extra and build a fresh building.”
South Hall is scheduled to be demolished as soon as commencement is over, said Dean O’Driscoll, assistant to the president for university relations.
“While a building board was on campus, they saw South Hall and any request to upgrade, they said no,” O’Driscoll said. “They gave the money to replace the building.”
The right people saw firsthand how outdated the building was, he said.
“We lucked out,” said Dialea Adams, Stauffer’s administrative assistant.
President Steven D. Bennion said a new facility will be built in its place.
“The funds came through a new category so the building will happen quickly,” Bennion said.
There are three major projects that are in the works for improving SUU. Funds for the South Hall project have no effect on the new teacher’s education project or the Eccles Housing Complex. All are from separate entities.
“There are numerous pots of funds that institutions can access within the state government,” Stauffer said.
Capital projects are in categories based on the cost exceeding approximately $1.5 million or costing
less than approximately $1.5 million. The South Hall demolition and rebuild will be less than $1.5 million, so funding and approval of the project was a quick process.
“Anytime you can expedite something, it is generally good,” Bennion said.
SUU typically receives between $1 and $2 million each year for capital improvements.
“We come up with a list of improvements that we would like to use the money for,” Stauffer said.
Input from Plant Operations goes into the list of desired campus approval projects. Then a campus planning committee, the Deans’ Council and the Board of Trustees approve the list

 

and prioritize the improvements, Stauffer said.
A member of the Division of Facility Construction Management and someone from the commissioners office came down in October to check the items on the list, Stauffer said. Items on the list totaled between $4 and $5 million.
Once the list has been viewed and prioritized, the DFCM decides which projects to take care of. The South Hall was top priority on SUU’s list and was viewed equally important by the DFCM.
After the selection was made to rebuild South Hall, the Legislature needs to give statutory requirements, and then SUU is ready to start the project, Stauffer said.
Money for the teacher education building will come from a capital facility fund, which is state appropriated money that goes through a dozen different levels of approval before the project is accepted. The approval process for capital facility projects is more involved than capital improvement projects, Stauffer said.
“By the time the shovel hits the ground, you’re mostly done,” he said, about capital facility funded projects.
The Eccles Housing Complex will be funded by donations and from fees students pay to live in on-campus housing, called a revenue bond.
Although financial approval has been granted for the South Hall project, is unclear when the project will begin, as well as be completed.
Stauffer said the architectural firm was just picked last week and it met on campus Tuesday for the first time to examine typography, see where utility poles are located, how the traffic flows, and other necessary things to plan the layout.
The firm also met with current users of South Hall on Wednesday to see what recommendations and desires they have for the new facility. The design team and construction team will also meet with Plant Operations and the users of South Hall to determine the infrastructure.
There has not been a final design calendar planned yet, Stauffer said.
“We’re going to do it, build it, get it down,” O’Driscoll said.
Stauffer said the desired completion time for the project would be by Fall semester, but Spring 2004 is more realistic. It’s difficult to move offices mid-stream and expect the students to transition after they have been in a ceratin room and seat for six weeks, Stauffer said.
“We don’t turn down a project because of time,” he said. “ It will be done within the fiscal year.”
The name of the new facility has not yet been decided, O’Driscoll said.
It will be approximately the same size as the building it is replacing, Stauffer said.
“If we keep wants and desires in check, we will replace the existing blue print with one the same size, “ Stauffer said.
O’Driscoll said they will do what they can with the money they have been allotted.