September 11
commemorative
edition

 


Back to Current Issue
October 28, 2002 edition

Candidates: Economy’s
jump-start ranks high

John Swallow (above) and Jim Matheson (below) agree the economy is the top priority for the 2nd Congressional District but provide differing solutions. Swallow proposes less infringing taxes, and Matheson said investing in basic infrastructure is the way to jump-start the economy.
PHOTOS BY ANNIE BROWN / UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

By TASHA WILLIAMS
UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

In the only debate in southern Utah for 2nd Congressional District, candidates John Swallow and Jim Matheson both agreed Thursday the most important issue in their district is the need to jump start the economy.
The candidates were asked five questions from SUU students, detailing their passionate views on partial-birth abortion and women’s rights.
Other topics debated included the role Congress should play in the war on Iraq, nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain, and their support to decrease the effects of the drought on southern Utah ranchers.
Matheson, who was first elected to serve in Congress in 2000, said to boost the economy he supported legislation to hold corporate wrong-doers accountable for their actions and said this was a critical first step in rerouting the economy.
“We all accept risk,” Matheson said. “We understand that’s part of what’s a good, open, free market. But what we don’t accept is when people don’t play by the rules. And when they don’t play by the rules, they need to be held accountable.”
He also said as a member of the House Transportation Committee he has helped the economy flourish by making an investment in “basic infrastructure,” such as boosting roads and airports to increase economic development in southern Utah.
Swallow, who is serving his third term in the Utah House of Representatives, mentioned the importance of education funding but also agreed that the economy is the most important problem for Utah citizens.
He said the way to fix the problem is to create local jobs.
He said he would help local commissioners work on the growth of economic development plans.
“I think people out in this part of the state are sick and tired of having to send all their kids to the Wasatch Front to be educated,” Swallow said.
“Thank goodness we have SUU here so we educate in a wonderful, wonderful institution here, but also to retain them here.”

Featured Articles:

Carter earns 'nobel' award

Disguise : Finding the costume
is easy with creativity

Hail Mary : 'Birds outlasted by
St. Mary's at home

Keeping taxes down is also important aspect of a flourishing economy, Swallow said, who was recognized as the 2000 Taxpayer Advocate bythe Utah Taxpayers’ Association. He said low taxes are a way for businesses to flourish.
In an issue Swallow said is “probably the most sensitive” subject among the debate, the candidates heatedly discussed legislation dealing with late-term abortions and other late-term procedures.
“I can’t think of a more heinous act that we as American civilization allow to happen under our laws,” Swallow said.
Swallow said he wouldn’t have voted with Matheson, who he said voted against Chris Cannon and Jim Hansen in seven abortion-related votes since he’s been in office. Matheson said there has been more than seven votes, some of which he voted with Cannon and Hansen. He said he has always believed the procedure should be banned and said it is prohibited under Utah law.
“When it comes to the issue of late-term abortions, I have always said this procedure should be banned, just like our Utah State Legislative law, just like the law in 40 states in this country, because it’s banned but for exceptions of life or health of the mother,” Matheson said. “That’s what will pass constitutional muster, that’s the position of the state of Utah, that’s the position I’ve taken since the day I’ve taken office.”
He said if Swallow was so concerned he should have been more aggressive in changing the law.
“My opponent has . . . never taken any legislative action in his 6 years in the legislature to change the Utah law,” Matheson said. “Now we’re in election season, it’s time to heat up the rhetoric.”
Swallow maintained that the issues dealing with abortion were value-centered and said he would have voted with Cannon and Hansen. He also quoted President Bush, who said the unborn are citizens who also have rights.
The candidates were also passionate about issues regarding the nuclear waste storage at Yucca Mountain and its transportation through Utah. Both men were adamant about preventing this action and against temporary storage at Goshute Valley Indian Reservation.
Matheson, who said the issue was “near and dear” to his heart, said he is concerned about this issue and how it has been handled in Congress.
He said because of his position on the House Transportation Committee, he was surprised that no one noted the risk of the waste’s transportation through Utah, which includes the risk of terrorist attacks.
“In a post-9/11 world, we have to start imagining things that were unimaginable before,” Matheson said.
Matheson also said he was surprised to be the single dissenting vote for the Yucca Mountain issue.
“I’m tired of being a dumping ground for the rest of the nation’s waste,” Matheson said. “We have paid our price when it comes to radioactive material in this country’s history.”
Matheson said the problem with the Yucca Mountain decision was politics, and he said it wasn’t just coincidence the waste ended up in one of the western states with the least congressional representatives.
Swallow also said he would have voted against Yucca Mountain if he had been sitting in Congress. He said Yucca Mountain is a states’ rights issue, and Utah citizens should have the right to vote on if they want the waste transported through Utah.
He also said Congress should look at a way to reprocess the waste before it is transported.
The candidates also discussed the pending war on Iraq and what they believe Congress’ role should be in the decision.
Swallow said America is living in a time unlike any before and said these times require strong governmental leadership. He urged representatives to empower the president to make strong decisions for the country, but said if America decides to go to war, he will support that decision.
“There’s a good chance that diplomacy might work, we’ve empowered the president with the authority to go to war,” Swallow said. “I would support that under the circumstances, because I do believe that weapons of mass destruction are being proliferated and that this regime already has a history of doing this.”
Both Matheson and Swallow agree that America can depend on its resources to support America if the decision is made to go to war.
“I hope that as America, (we) can all join with faith and prayers for America, and hope and pray we don’t have to go to war, and then hope that America is protected by our technologies, our resources, our soldiers, and by our faith,” Swallow said.
Matheson said war is not the first option and he has talked with President Bush about disarming Saddam Hussein and encouraging a regime change.
The drought in southern Utah was also discussed by the candidates who both said they had talked with local ranchers to get a feel for the problem.
Matheson said he supports Conservation Reserve Programs that have already opened up lands that were set aside and preserved for times of need during drought.
Swallow said he wants to serve on the House Resource Committee and supports local control, local input, and case-by-case investigation.
He emphasized the importance of taking care of the American farmer.

SU students responsible for rights, officials say

By MELISSA NIELSEN
UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

Ignorance is no excuse for students who should be aware of their rights and responsibilities, an assistant to Utah’s attorney general said.
“We go to great lengths to publish and make available to students the codes of conduct and other policy statements of their rights and responsibilities so they can make themselves aware,” said D. Michael Carter, assistant attorney general and legal counsel for higher education affairs at SUU.
“We also make every effort to keep them in line with constitutional guidelines that are applicable,” he added.
Student rights and responsibilities are available in the student handbook and on the SUU Web site.
As a citizen and student, each individual is responsible to know his or her rights and understand that, even if they don’t know them, they still apply, the leader of SUUSA’s Judicial Council said.
“If students don’t understand their rights, they can’t exercise them,” said Geoffrey Chesnut, the council’s chief justice.
A lot of students misunderstand general rights from the constitution that are
applicable in any state institution, Chesnut said.
Some students don’t understand what the rights are. They

 

think they have rights that don’t exist, such as the right not to be offended. Then they don’t understand the rights they do have, Chesnut said.
“I think that for the most part university policies are
constitutional; difficulty comes from applying those rights,” Chesnut said.
The current SUUSA Constitution does not allow for student grievances to be redressed, Chesnut said.
The Judicial Council specifically deals with the current SUUSA Constitution discussing with the senate and the student body in deciding what is constitutional.
In the current Constitution, the senate and the assembly are granted supreme power and ensures no student rights. If a student has a grievance they are advised to go to the Judicial Council, Chesnut said.
Student rights are the same rights issued in the U.S. Constitution, SUUSA President Matt Glazier said.
Voting for student representatives is the basis of the democratic system, Glazier said. SUUSA officers exist to serve as the student voice. They represent the student body while serving in an influential position.
“There is a difference between authority and influence,” Glazier said. “The power is where we have a vote.”
Student leaders have the power to instigate change when they have a counted vote serving in leadership positions in groups such ACUC, Board of Trustees, the University Journal and SUUSA.
Glazier said students may appeal to their student leaders and to express their opinions. They need to understand that if enough students get behind something, that is how they effect change, he said.