September 11
commemorative
edition

 


Back to Current Issue
November 7, 2002 edition

Looking glass

Memorial celebrates 20th anniversary

Jessica Felt of Alexandria, Va., reaches to touch a name engraved on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, that of a soldier she and her sister Patricia believe to be a relative. Since its dedication 20 years ago this week, the Wall has been celebrated and imitated, analyzed and criticized.
FRANK JOHNSON / THE WASHINGTON POST

By MONTE REEL
THE WASHINGTON POST

WASHINGTON – Patricia Felt had stood in front of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial many times before, but one day last week she saw something she had never noticed: Her last name engraved in the glossy black granite.
She consulted the catalogue with the list of the war’s casualties and checked the information – the date of death, the home town. It caught her off guard; she had never thought to look for anyone she knew.
“I think that must be uncle Joe’s son,” she said. “I’ve got to call my sister and tell her about this.”
A few yards away, Ralph Funk was viewing the memorial for the first time. “Larry, old boy,” he said, eyeing the name of his nephew, “I finally got to see you.” Before he could finish that sentence, emotion took the 57-year-old veteran by the throat, squeezing the last two words to a higher pitch.
The two experiences – a new discovery, a first encounter – were repeated many times during the day, as they have almost every day for the past 20 years. Felt, of Alexandria, Va., and Funk, of Western Maryland, are among more than 40 million people who have made the Wall the most popular memorial in America.
Since its dedication 20 years ago this week, it has been celebrated and imitated, analyzed and criticized, amended and altered. And, as Felt and Funk discovered, the Wall that lists the names of 58,229 casualties has not lost its ability to surprise.
“I think of all the people I knew in the war,” said Susan Hendrickson, an Oregonian visiting for the first time, slipping past Funk to scan more names. “I wonder where their names are on this wall. Just look at all these . . .”
Jan Scruggs shepherded the memorial from an abstract idea
to the mass of stone that stands today. After a tour in Vietnam, Scruggs studied sociology and collective psychology at American

Featured Articles:

Restructuring is not enough

Double dose : Sextasy’s effects can be fatal

Take-off : SUU impresses to start, but lets big lead slip in 77-76 loss

University.
“This book,” Scruggs says, grabbing Carried to the Wall by Kristin Ann Hass, a sociologist at the University of Michigan, “traces fundamental changes in how the public mourns to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. There are many examples of things the Memorial influenced, like the AIDS quilt, and a lot of other similar memorials across the country. There’s a theory that highway headstones – the crosses and markers people leave at the scene of accidents – can be traced back to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.”
The memorial itself, he says, can be traced to 1979, when he watched The Deer Hunter, a movie chronicling the dark struggles of returning Vietnam veterans. When Scruggs took his eyes away from the screen, he saw a void unfilled by ticker tape, molded clay or cast bronze. The shape of this void, he figured, was monolithic. An obelisk maybe. Something tall and proud, like every other memorial he’d ever seen.
Scruggs founded the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund to raise money for a memorial. He still runs it, working in a downtown Washington office with a staff of eight. The organization raises money for the Wall’s upkeep and has launched an educational program for teachers. It also takes calls from imitators, and the calls keep coming.
“A problem is starting to surface,” Scruggs says. “I just got a call from a guy in San Diego who said, ‘Wouldn’t it be cool if we had an exact, full-scale replica in San Diego?’... This thing begat memorials in all 50 states.”
The memorial fund has no copyright on the design of the Wall, which Scruggs says might have been a mistake. But he understands why people who visit want to replicate their experience at home: It’s a sociological phenomenon that has to do with collective grieving, healing and the filling of voids. He just had no idea so many voids would prove to be the same shape.
Forrest Brandt’s voice falters when he talks about his first impressions of the Wall as envisioned by young architect Maya Ying Lin.
“I guess I was still harboring some resentment. I would hate to admit a racist thought, but I was like, why an Oriental to design the Vietnam memorial? Isn’t there a quote-unquote American out there who could do it? And the design itself just sounded wrong. ‘What do you mean, a ditch? There’s nothing heroic there, just a list of dead names,’” he said.
When his veterans group decided to visit the Wall that autumn, Brandt refused to go.
“I expected them to come back and say, ‘Oh, it was awful! A disgrace!’ Instead they came back overwhelmed. To a man, they said it was a stroke of genius,” he said.
Brandt said he has visited the memorial many times since then and plans to attend the anniversary ceremonies.

Matheson wins

By TYLER JOHNSON
UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

On Election Day Tuesday, Utah kept its reputation for being dominantly republican with every race being won by the Republican Party except for the seat in the 2nd Congressional District race.
Republicans control enough of Utah’s government seats to be in control of the government, according to a Nov. 6 Deseret News article.
The race for the congressional seat in the 2nd District between Jim Matheson and John Swallow was the closest race in the state, according to KSL’s Web site (www.ksl.com).
Late Wednesday, Swallow conceded the election in a press conference and said it appeared Matheson won despite uncounted ballots from Daggett and Garfield counties.
Matheson had 50 percent (108,488 votes) and Swallow had 49 percent (106,473 votes).
Swallow was the favorite in Iron
County by 3,267 votes.
He won 6,111 votes compared to Matheson’s 2,844 votes.
Patrick Diehl, Green Party candidate, won 1.14 percent (2,508) of the votes district-wide. Ron Copier, Libertarian Party candidate, won 0.72 percent (1,579) of the votes.
Nationally, Republican candidates gained control of both the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives after Tuesday’s historic mid-term election.
According to cnn.com, “the election marked only the second time since 1934 that a president’s party didn’t lose House seats in a midterm ballot – the first time for a Republican president since 1902.
“The last president whose party gained seats in both houses of Congress in a midterm election was Franklin Roosevelt, 68 years ago.”
Republicans now have 51 senate seats to Democrats’ 47; Republicans also now have 228 House seats to Democrats’ 205.
One senate seat remains undecided in a Louisiana race; Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu must participate in a runoff election because returns indicated she had not picked up at least 50 percent of the vote, as required by state law.
Other issues on the Utah ballot yesterday include Utah State Constitutional Amendment No. 1, which proposed to eliminate the requirement that part of the interest earnings of the State School Fund be retained in the fund as protection against inflation and also provide that dividends from investment of the State School Fund be spent to support the public education system, passed with 62.71 percent of voters in favor of it.
Constitutional Amendment No. 2, which authorizes counties that share common boundaries to make minor adjustments, authorizes any other move of part of one county to another and requires a vote of the entire county to move the borders, also passed with 72.84 percent of the voters in agreement.
Amendment No. 3, which reorganizes and clarifies the Revenue and Taxation Article and changes the membership of county boards of equalization from county commissioners to elected

 

Samantha Brooks, a sophmore elementary education major from Slidell, La., and her sister Jessica Brooks, a junior criminal justice major also from Slidell, vote Tuesday.
ELIZABETH MILLER / UNIVERSITY JOURNAL

county officials as provided by state, passed with the support of 70.12 percent of the popular vote.
Amendment No. 4, which prohibits the legislature from transacting business during a special session unless the governor gives 48 hours advance public notice of that legislative business except in cases of declared emergency or with the approval of two-thirds of the Utah Senate and House of Representatives, passed with 77.41 percent of the vote.Amendment No. 5, which changes how the State Constitution designates cities that are allowed to incur a specified voter-approved debt and clarifies that the measurement of a county’s debt limit is based on the value of taxable property in the county, also passed with 66.24 percent of the voters in agreement.
Amendment No. 6 was the only amendment of the six proposed changes that failed.
The amendment proposed the Constitution be changed to authorize the creation of a property tax exemption for property not owned but used, controlled and possessed by the state or local government.
More than 57 percent of the voters were opposed to this amendment.
Initiative No. 1 failed with nearly 68 percent of the voters opposed.
The initiative prohibits certain state regulatory agency employees and board members from employment or lobbying in the field of radioactive waste disposal or storage for three years after employment.
The voters allowed all six of the appellate court judges (Russell W. Bench, Judith H. Billings, James Z. Davis, Pamela T. Greenwood, Norman H. Jackson and Gregory K. Orme) to remain in office. J. Phillip Eves, local 5th Judicial District Court judge, was allowed to stay in office as well.
Debra G. Roberts won the race for the Board of Education for local 15th District by a 4.96 percent margin over Max L. Torres