Do not increase our student fees
It’s time for students to stand up for themselves.
Only a month after administrators announced a 23.5-percent
increase in tuition for Fall 2003, they turned around
and asked student leaders to approve an increase in student
fees as well.
While the proposal is only for a $6.50 increase a semester,
it’s more of an issue of principle than cost.
Is it just us, or do they seem to be milking a dead cow?
Can students really afford to pay all of these increases?
We think not.
Inch by inch, penny by penny, administrators — and
now our student representatives — keep raising the
cost of our education and keep pushing students away.
Administrators increased tuition for the 2002-2003 school
year and the 2003-2004 school year. On Tuesday, the SUUSA
Senate will vote on increasing student fees for fall.
Does anyone else see a pattern here? The pattern will
continue until we stand in front of administrators and
tell them we’ve had enough. We cannot sit around
and allow more increases.
Paralleling the administrators’ pattern for destroying
our checkbooks is the students’ pattern of apathy.
Few SUU students told the administration or student leaders
their true feelings about all the increases. A lot of
students have complained to friends or in class about
the tuition increase, but not many have spoken out to
student leaders or administrators.
The University Journal is speaking out now and asks all
students to speak out with us.
Administrators seem to believe it’s OK to increase
fees and tuition, and the students won’t say anything
about it. If students are against the proposed fee increases
— and we sense that they are — they need to
tell their student leaders and administrators.
We understand the tuition increase is needed. A good portion
of the the tuition increase will go to marketing. If done
right, marketing can bring more students and increase
our per-student funding from the state. But what’s
our new marketing slogan going to be? “Find yourself
. . . paying 23.5 percent more for tuition.”
If we’re going to pay 23.5 percent more for tuition,
that money ought to be used to improve programs already
on campus. Too many current programs are under-funded
and require improvement. Marketing cannot fix a flawed
program, but a sound program will sell itself.
The argument for allowing a hike in our student fees is
to improve the computers on campus and to decrease cost
of admission to shows produced by the College of Performing
& Visual Arts.
Five dollars of the $6.50 increase is supposed to be spent
on improving the computers. What’s wrong with the
computers now? Most students would be willing to sacrifice
the perks of
|
|
 |
additions to the new computer systems for a couple of
years to keep the student fees at a reasonable level.
We currently pay $60 per student per year for our computers.
That is the third highest amount of money in student fees
for computer usage in the state. Weber State students only
pay $18.62, according to information released by the Utah
System of High Education.
We agree the College of Performing & Visual Arts, along
with every other college at SUU, is suffering from the budget
cuts. The proposed idea is to increase student fees and
earmark part of the increase for fine arts to reduce the
cost of admission.
In a letter to the President’s Council, the three
College of Performing & Visual Arts senators said they
believe several of their requests for the proposed increase
should be departmentally funded, but they are asking for
the money because of the lack of university funding.
We agree the College of Performing & Visual Arts should
be departmentally funded. If more funds are needed, the
23.5 percent increase should be re-allocated to include
supporting the programs SUU already has.
Students are sick of the increases. It is time to do something.
We need to attend the SUUSA Senate meeting on Tuesday at
6:30 p.m. and tell our elected representatives that we are
against the increase in student fees.
If this pattern of increasing costs continue, SUU is going
to lose faithful students to other schools in Utah who promise
a less expensive education.
The opinion expressed above is the collective perspective
of the University Journal editorial board. The editorial
board meets every Tuesday at 6 p.m. in Room 172 of the Sharwan
Smith Center. Visitors are welcome.
|