Do not increase our student fees

It’s time for students to stand up for themselves.
Only a month after administrators announced a 23.5-percent increase in tuition for Fall 2003, they turned around and asked student leaders to approve an increase in student fees as well.
While the proposal is only for a $6.50 increase a semester, it’s more of an issue of principle than cost.
Is it just us, or do they seem to be milking a dead cow?
Can students really afford to pay all of these increases? We think not.
Inch by inch, penny by penny, administrators — and now our student representatives — keep raising the cost of our education and keep pushing students away.
Administrators increased tuition for the 2002-2003 school year and the 2003-2004 school year. On Tuesday, the SUUSA Senate will vote on increasing student fees for fall.
Does anyone else see a pattern here? The pattern will continue until we stand in front of administrators and tell them we’ve had enough. We cannot sit around and allow more increases.
Paralleling the administrators’ pattern for destroying our checkbooks is the students’ pattern of apathy.
Few SUU students told the administration or student leaders their true feelings about all the increases. A lot of students have complained to friends or in class about the tuition increase, but not many have spoken out to student leaders or administrators.
The University Journal is speaking out now and asks all students to speak out with us.
Administrators seem to believe it’s OK to increase fees and tuition, and the students won’t say anything about it. If students are against the proposed fee increases — and we sense that they are — they need to tell their student leaders and administrators.
We understand the tuition increase is needed. A good portion of the the tuition increase will go to marketing. If done right, marketing can bring more students and increase our per-student funding from the state. But what’s our new marketing slogan going to be? “Find yourself . . . paying 23.5 percent more for tuition.”
If we’re going to pay 23.5 percent more for tuition, that money ought to be used to improve programs already on campus. Too many current programs are under-funded and require improvement. Marketing cannot fix a flawed program, but a sound program will sell itself.
The argument for allowing a hike in our student fees is to improve the computers on campus and to decrease cost of admission to shows produced by the College of Performing & Visual Arts.
Five dollars of the $6.50 increase is supposed to be spent on improving the computers. What’s wrong with the computers now? Most students would be willing to sacrifice the perks of

 

additions to the new computer systems for a couple of years to keep the student fees at a reasonable level.
We currently pay $60 per student per year for our computers. That is the third highest amount of money in student fees for computer usage in the state. Weber State students only pay $18.62, according to information released by the Utah System of High Education.
We agree the College of Performing & Visual Arts, along with every other college at SUU, is suffering from the budget cuts. The proposed idea is to increase student fees and earmark part of the increase for fine arts to reduce the cost of admission.
In a letter to the President’s Council, the three College of Performing & Visual Arts senators said they believe several of their requests for the proposed increase should be departmentally funded, but they are asking for the money because of the lack of university funding.
We agree the College of Performing & Visual Arts should be departmentally funded. If more funds are needed, the 23.5 percent increase should be re-allocated to include supporting the programs SUU already has.
Students are sick of the increases. It is time to do something. We need to attend the SUUSA Senate meeting on Tuesday at 6:30 p.m. and tell our elected representatives that we are against the increase in student fees.
If this pattern of increasing costs continue, SUU is going to lose faithful students to other schools in Utah who promise a less expensive education.
The opinion expressed above is the collective perspective of the University Journal editorial board. The editorial board meets every Tuesday at 6 p.m. in Room 172 of the Sharwan Smith Center. Visitors are welcome.