ELLI Proposal Rubric
Proposed presentations will be reviewed based on the following rubric.
Revised 17 December 2018
| Evaluation Criteria | Excellent 4 | Satisfactory 3 | Needs Improvement 2 | Component Missing 0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposal Title | The title gains the reader's interest, and participants will know what the session is about just from the title. | The title generally describes what the session will be about. | The title is confusing,vague, or contradictory to the presentation's purpose. | There is no title. |
| Presentation Outline | The description previews the topic, arranges the material in an interesting way, includes active learning, and shows how it will be concluded. | The description of the proposal is complete, and includes an element of active learning. | There is little description, organization, or active learning to the proposal, and could be organized in a more appropriate way for the topic. | There is no description or organization to the proposal. |
| Quality of Scholarship with Regards to Experiential Education[1] | The proposal is based on sound principles of Experiential Education, and represents innovation with a solid scholarly foundation. | The proposal provides evidence of a link to existing Experiential Education theories, studies, known practices of Experiential Education. | The proposal shows little evidence to existing Experiential Education theories, studies, known practices or appears to be merely a restatement of existing work. | The proposal shows no evidence or link to theories, studies, or known practices. |
| Importance of Topic to ELLI Conference (Theme: Experience of World of Learning) | The proposal represents an important or very useful advance in teaching, engagement, or promotion of student learning in the area of Experiential Education | The proposal has some value in terms of advancing practice or scholarly work in the area of Experiential Education. | The proposal appears to have value in terms of advancing practice or scholarly work in the area of Experiential Education but is vague or confusing. | The proposal does not offer new information or ideas that could further either practice or scholarship in Experiential Education. |
| Learning Outcomes | Learning Outcomes support the purpose of the proposal and experiential education. | Learning Outcomes support the purpose of the proposal. | Learning Outcomes are vague or confusing. | There are no Learning Outcomes. |
Footnotes
- ELLI Experiential Education categories include the following:
- Scholarship: Empirical, Applied, or Pedagogical;
- Best Practices;
- NSEE's Eight Principles of Good Practice for Experiential Learning Activities;
- Evaluation and Assessment;
- Internships and Career Development;
- Community Engagement/Service Learning;
- Education Abroad/Global Engagement;
- Outdoor Engagement; *Student Leadership and Development Opportunities